Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: James <jtp@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] any gentoo mutt users?
Date: Sun, 03 May 2009 20:23:44
Message-Id: e107b4ff0905030703r5a24563atd04bb94cf96a7c7d@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] any gentoo mutt users? by Alan McKinnon
1 Ahhh yes, screen!
2
3 Good idea. ;) I'll have to think about how to implement this because
4 I'm not certain I'll have access to one single server from all the
5 different locations I know I'm going to be using mutt as a mail
6 client.
7
8 :)
9
10 Definitely geeky to boot! Good idea indeed!
11
12 -j
13
14 On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 5:10 AM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote:
15 > On Sunday 03 May 2009 06:06:54 James wrote:
16 >> Alan,
17 >>
18 >> Thanks for the response. :)
19 >>
20 >> I've thought about doing something similar to this, but it's a last
21 >> resort. I end up using mutt on various different workstations and it'd
22 >> be nice to run everything "locally". Obviously a solution where I'm
23 >> fetching mail on every machine where I'm using mutt doesn't scale very
24 >> well.
25 >
26 > I've got several hard-core network engineer users with the same problem. They
27 > solved it in a neat way, by running mutt in a permanent screen session on a
28 > server I provided for the purpose. Getmail is now not necessary as I deliver
29 > their mail to that machine. Working on the LAN and from home over vpn it just
30 > works, connecting from home without vpn is a simple matter of ssh port
31 > forwarding. Their shell profiles on every workstation runs screen and
32 > .screenrc is set up to automatically connect to that server.
33 >
34 > It works for them and is just geeky enough to appeal :-)
35 >
36 > --
37 > alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
38 >

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] any gentoo mutt users? Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>