1 |
Ahhh yes, screen! |
2 |
|
3 |
Good idea. ;) I'll have to think about how to implement this because |
4 |
I'm not certain I'll have access to one single server from all the |
5 |
different locations I know I'm going to be using mutt as a mail |
6 |
client. |
7 |
|
8 |
:) |
9 |
|
10 |
Definitely geeky to boot! Good idea indeed! |
11 |
|
12 |
-j |
13 |
|
14 |
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 5:10 AM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
15 |
> On Sunday 03 May 2009 06:06:54 James wrote: |
16 |
>> Alan, |
17 |
>> |
18 |
>> Thanks for the response. :) |
19 |
>> |
20 |
>> I've thought about doing something similar to this, but it's a last |
21 |
>> resort. I end up using mutt on various different workstations and it'd |
22 |
>> be nice to run everything "locally". Obviously a solution where I'm |
23 |
>> fetching mail on every machine where I'm using mutt doesn't scale very |
24 |
>> well. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> I've got several hard-core network engineer users with the same problem. They |
27 |
> solved it in a neat way, by running mutt in a permanent screen session on a |
28 |
> server I provided for the purpose. Getmail is now not necessary as I deliver |
29 |
> their mail to that machine. Working on the LAN and from home over vpn it just |
30 |
> works, connecting from home without vpn is a simple matter of ssh port |
31 |
> forwarding. Their shell profiles on every workstation runs screen and |
32 |
> .screenrc is set up to automatically connect to that server. |
33 |
> |
34 |
> It works for them and is just geeky enough to appeal :-) |
35 |
> |
36 |
> -- |
37 |
> alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
38 |
> |