| 1 |
On 2017-04-25 19:59, R0b0t1 <r030t1@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 10:05 AM, Danny YUE <sheepduke@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> On 2017-04-25 14:29, lee <lee@××××××××.de> wrote: |
| 5 |
>>> Hi, |
| 6 |
>>> |
| 7 |
>>> since the usage of FTP seems to be declining, what is a replacement |
| 8 |
>>> which is at least as good as FTP? |
| 9 |
>>> |
| 10 |
>>> I'm aware that there's webdav, but that's very awkward to use and |
| 11 |
>>> missing features. |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> What about sshfs? It allows you to mount a location that can be accessed |
| 14 |
>> via ssh to your local file system, as if you are using ssh. |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> In a similar vein, scp. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
And considering something still robust but a little more smart, rsync. |
Archives