| 1 |
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 8:26 PM, Danny YUE <sheepduke@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On 2017-04-25 19:59, R0b0t1 <r030t1@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
>> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 10:05 AM, Danny YUE <sheepduke@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 |
>>> |
| 6 |
>>> On 2017-04-25 14:29, lee <lee@××××××××.de> wrote: |
| 7 |
>>>> Hi, |
| 8 |
>>>> |
| 9 |
>>>> since the usage of FTP seems to be declining, what is a replacement |
| 10 |
>>>> which is at least as good as FTP? |
| 11 |
>>>> |
| 12 |
>>>> I'm aware that there's webdav, but that's very awkward to use and |
| 13 |
>>>> missing features. |
| 14 |
>>> |
| 15 |
>>> What about sshfs? It allows you to mount a location that can be accessed |
| 16 |
>>> via ssh to your local file system, as if you are using ssh. |
| 17 |
>>> |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
>> In a similar vein, scp. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> And considering something still robust but a little more smart, rsync. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
I was actually going to come back and suggest rscync over ssh. I |
| 25 |
didn't originally mention it because I typically associate rsync with |
| 26 |
backups. |
Archives