| 1 |
On 2017-04-26 20:25, R0b0t1 <r030t1@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 8:26 PM, Danny YUE <sheepduke@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> On 2017-04-25 19:59, R0b0t1 <r030t1@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 |
>>> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 10:05 AM, Danny YUE <sheepduke@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 6 |
>>>> |
| 7 |
>>>> On 2017-04-25 14:29, lee <lee@××××××××.de> wrote: |
| 8 |
>>>>> Hi, |
| 9 |
>>>>> |
| 10 |
>>>>> since the usage of FTP seems to be declining, what is a replacement |
| 11 |
>>>>> which is at least as good as FTP? |
| 12 |
>>>>> |
| 13 |
>>>>> I'm aware that there's webdav, but that's very awkward to use and |
| 14 |
>>>>> missing features. |
| 15 |
>>>> |
| 16 |
>>>> What about sshfs? It allows you to mount a location that can be accessed |
| 17 |
>>>> via ssh to your local file system, as if you are using ssh. |
| 18 |
>>>> |
| 19 |
>>> |
| 20 |
>>> In a similar vein, scp. |
| 21 |
>> |
| 22 |
>> And considering something still robust but a little more smart, rsync. |
| 23 |
>> |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> I was actually going to come back and suggest rscync over ssh. I |
| 26 |
> didn't originally mention it because I typically associate rsync with |
| 27 |
> backups. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
I recently found that rsnapshot (based on rsync) is a good and solid |
| 30 |
tool for backup...You may try it out ;-) |
Archives