| 1 |
On Tue, Dec 25, 2007 at 05:26:31PM -0800, Jason Dusek wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Dec 25, 2007 6:26 AM, <felix@×××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Mon, Dec 24, 2007 at 10:57:10PM -0800, Jason Dusek wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > On Dec 23, 2007 8:23 AM, <felix@×××××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > > Emerging haxml directly repeats the greedy performance... |
| 6 |
> > > |
| 7 |
> > > Does deleting the ebuild (not haxml, just that particular ebuild, as |
| 8 |
> > > suggested by "manually remove the ebuild", make any difference? |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > I took "manually remove the ebuild" to mean do all the remove steps |
| 11 |
> > myself, but I don't have any idea what those steps are. Do you think |
| 12 |
> > it means the actual haxml-1.13.2.ebuild file? I'd be willing to try |
| 13 |
> > that, but that is the most recent ebuild. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Maybe you're reading it right, but it's not clear -- if you are |
| 16 |
> supposed to remove HaXML by hand, it should have said "manually |
| 17 |
> remove the package". When you say "Emerging HaXML directly |
| 18 |
> repeats the greedy performance...", do you mean *unmerging* |
| 19 |
> HaXML is not doable? You could try unmerging it and then |
| 20 |
> re-emerging it. If you've already tried that, though, then I'll |
| 21 |
> have to think of something else :) |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> I'm using the same HaXML you are, actually. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Interesting ... unmerge quits by itself, but with the same error. |
| 26 |
I am tempted to delete haskell itself, as far as possible, and see if |
| 27 |
the haxml unmerge would get any further. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
# emerge -C dev-haskell/haxml |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
dev-haskell/haxml |
| 32 |
selected: 1.13.2 |
| 33 |
protected: none |
| 34 |
omitted: none |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
>>> 'Selected' packages are slated for removal. |
| 37 |
>>> 'Protected' and 'omitted' packages will not be removed. |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
>>> Waiting 5 seconds before starting... |
| 40 |
>>> (Control-C to abort)... |
| 41 |
>>> Unmerging in: 5 4 3 2 1 |
| 42 |
>>> Unmerging dev-haskell/haxml-1.13.2... |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
Exiting on signal 2 |
| 46 |
* The 'prerm' phase of the 'dev-haskell/haxml-1.13.2' package has failed |
| 47 |
* with exit value -1. The problem occurred while executing the ebuild |
| 48 |
* located at '/var/db/pkg/dev-haskell/haxml-1.13.2/haxml-1.13.2.ebuild'. |
| 49 |
* If necessary, manually remove the ebuild in order to skip the execution |
| 50 |
* of removal phases. |
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
* Messages for package dev-haskell/haxml-1.13.2: |
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
* The 'prerm' phase of the 'dev-haskell/haxml-1.13.2' package has failed |
| 55 |
* with exit value -1. The problem occurred while executing the ebuild |
| 56 |
* located at '/var/db/pkg/dev-haskell/haxml-1.13.2/haxml-1.13.2.ebuild'. |
| 57 |
* If necessary, manually remove the ebuild in order to skip the execution |
| 58 |
* of removal phases. |
| 59 |
|
| 60 |
|
| 61 |
-- |
| 62 |
... _._. ._ ._. . _._. ._. ___ .__ ._. . .__. ._ .. ._. |
| 63 |
Felix Finch: scarecrow repairman & rocket surgeon / felix@×××××××.com |
| 64 |
GPG = E987 4493 C860 246C 3B1E 6477 7838 76E9 182E 8151 ITAR license #4933 |
| 65 |
I've found a solution to Fermat's Last Theorem but I see I've run out of room o |
| 66 |
-- |
| 67 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives