Archives
Archives
| From: | Ralf Stephan <ralf@×××××××××××××.de> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo Rules | ||
| Date: | Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:11:05 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20071217102958.GA7788@ark.in-berlin.de | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo Rules by Grant |
||
| 1 | > What does everyone else think about this. Is portage a major blocker |
| 2 | > of progress or not so much? |
| 3 | |
| 4 | As said above, details are major blockers of progress. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | On the other hand, when I switched to paludis, 100 MB |
| 7 | of unnecessary packages suddenly were available to delete. |
| 8 | So, paludis must do something right where portage didn't. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | ralf |
| 12 | |
| 13 | -- |
| 14 | gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo Rules | Rumen Yotov <rumen@××××××.org> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo Rules | Grant <emailgrant@×××××.com> |