1 |
Joost Roeleveld wrote: |
2 |
> On Thursday 07 April 2011 08:57:40 Dale wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> Neil Bothwick wrote: |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>>> On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 15:21:33 +0200, Joost Roeleveld wrote: |
7 |
>>> |
8 |
>>>> I think Dale will probably succeed in breaking it :) |
9 |
>>>> |
10 |
>>>> Dale, this comment isn't meant as an insult. I honestly think you |
11 |
>>>> would |
12 |
>>>> be perfect for some QA or Testing job :) |
13 |
>>>> |
14 |
>>> But not on any project you wanted to finish on time ;-) |
15 |
>>> |
16 |
>> Joost, I see your point. This is my life saying. If it wasn't for bad |
17 |
>> luck, I wouldn't have any luck at all. I hope for the best but expect |
18 |
>> the worst. You should see my dining room. Full of food stuff just in |
19 |
>> case. After my last visit to the grocery store, I'm thinking I may not |
20 |
>> have enough yet. o_O I also have a generator and some gas stored too. |
21 |
>> I also have a big garden to grow food as well. I may be disabled but I |
22 |
>> ain't stupid. I just try to keep the bad things that can happen in the |
23 |
>> back of my mind and keep a plan going, just in case it does hit the fan. |
24 |
>> |
25 |
> The Internet is a mixed blessing. We only see what people type. But have |
26 |
> difficulty understanding their personal situation because we don't see it. |
27 |
> Up untill the point you mentioned you're disabled, I was like "Hmm... I know a |
28 |
> few people like that :) " |
29 |
> I would call that self-sufficient and quite clever. I would like to be able to |
30 |
> move somewhere where I could just enjoy life and life of some piece of land. |
31 |
> |
32 |
> I would not consider you stupid, you've shown, at least in my opinion, that |
33 |
> you're not :) |
34 |
> |
35 |
> |
36 |
>> I'm sort of wanting to use this as a learning experience. If I can get |
37 |
>> things set up, working and understand what the heck things do, then I |
38 |
>> may try some more stuff. Right now, my light bulb is pretty dim on |
39 |
>> LVM. I don't understand how it works and what the heck those commands |
40 |
>> do. I'll have my light bulb moment eventually. Since I don't have the |
41 |
>> new drive ordered yet, I got time to read, listen and try to grasp it all. |
42 |
>> |
43 |
> The beginning of wisdom is admitting you don't have it ;) |
44 |
> |
45 |
> |
46 |
>> Just a old dog trying to learn new tricks. lol |
47 |
>> |
48 |
> I'm lousy at training dogs (or other animals), but lets see if I can make LVM, |
49 |
> or at least the way I use it, a bit clearer. |
50 |
> If anything isn't clear, please ask. |
51 |
> |
52 |
> We've already discussed the benefits of using it in a previous thread. So I'll |
53 |
> just skip those for now. |
54 |
> |
55 |
> With LVM, you end up with 1 or more VGs (Volume Group) |
56 |
> Each VG consists of 1 or more PV (Physical Volume) |
57 |
> Each VG can contain 1 or more LV (Logical Volume) |
58 |
> |
59 |
> In simple graphic: |
60 |
> PV<-> VG<-> LV |
61 |
> |
62 |
> A PV is either an entire physical disk or a partition on a physical disk. This |
63 |
> is why they're called "Physical Volume" |
64 |
> |
65 |
> A VG is a collection of Physical Volumes. The size of this depends equals the |
66 |
> total size of all the PVs in this group. |
67 |
> |
68 |
> An LV is a partition on this Volume Group. |
69 |
> |
70 |
> Now, here comes the nice part. It is possible to extend a VG and LV. |
71 |
> A VG is extended by adding a PV. It can also be reduced in size by removing a |
72 |
> PV. |
73 |
> NOTE: when removing a PV, ensure it is not used. (Tools exist for this) |
74 |
> |
75 |
> An LV can be extended as long as the VG has room for this. No movement of LVs |
76 |
> is necessary, just like files on a filesystem, they get spread over available |
77 |
> space. |
78 |
> NOTE: Yes, this does lead to fragmentation (Tools exist to assist in |
79 |
> defragmenting LVM) |
80 |
> You can also reduce the size of an LV. (Again, make sure reducing the LV in |
81 |
> size does not lead to loss of data) |
82 |
> |
83 |
> On top of an LV, any filesystem (Ext2/3/4, Reiserfs, XFS, JFS,....) can be |
84 |
> placed. Once an LV is created, the filesystem tools can simply access it just |
85 |
> like any other block device (eg. physical disk) |
86 |
> |
87 |
> When selecting a filesystem to put on top of an LV, do check wether or not it |
88 |
> at least supports increasing the size after creation. Most filesystems in use |
89 |
> do support this even while the filesystem is mounted. |
90 |
> Reducing the size of the filesystem is, in my use, less common. And I tend to |
91 |
> simply copy data to a temporary location when I do need to reduce the size. |
92 |
> |
93 |
> I hope the above makes it a bit clearer on how it "works". |
94 |
> |
95 |
> The actual commands for creating and managing an LVM-system, I'll leave for |
96 |
> another time if and when they are needed. |
97 |
> |
98 |
> -- |
99 |
> Joost |
100 |
> |
101 |
> |
102 |
|
103 |
I'm going to give this a stab here. I go buy a new drive. I use cfdisk |
104 |
to make it ready for LVM, the 8E thingy. I then tell LVM to make it a |
105 |
Physical Volume, either in whole or in part. I then tell LVM to make it |
106 |
a Volume Group and if I already had a drive using LVM I could then add |
107 |
the new drive to it. After that, I create Logical Volumes and put file |
108 |
systems on it for use sort of like the old partitions. |
109 |
|
110 |
Am I sort of getting on the right track? |
111 |
|
112 |
Did someone mention a GUI for this? ^-^ |
113 |
|
114 |
Dale |
115 |
|
116 |
:-) :-) |