Archives
Archives
| From: | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Demise of Truecrypt - surprised I haven't seen t his discussed here yet? | ||
| Date: | Thu, 05 Jun 2014 16:57:09 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAGfcS_=DXBM909XzJ7oT1adpf0DgMkmjc2ndRGR3h4o8DENCQw@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Demise of Truecrypt - surprised I haven't seen t his discussed here yet? by Frank Steinmetzger |
||
| 1 | On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Frank Steinmetzger <Warp_7@×××.de> wrote: |
| 2 | > Now that’s an interesting idea I haven’t thought of yet. Thanks. My LUKS |
| 3 | > passphrase is much more secure than my ancient user password anyway *hehe*. |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Only if it isn't the same. :) |
| 7 | |
| 8 | In theory neither really need be algorithmically more secure than the |
| 9 | other, but there is more opportunity for somebody to capture your |
| 10 | password after the system is running than while it is booting up. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | Rich |