Archives
Archives
| From: | Julien Roy <julien@××××.ca> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | Gentoo User <gentoo-user@l.g.o> | ||
| Cc: | Gentoo <gentoo-user@l.g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] foot terminal not in portage? | ||
| Date: | Sat, 11 Dec 2021 03:46:04 | ||
| Message-Id: | MqbaCWN--3-2@jroy.ca | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] foot terminal not in portage? by "caveman رَجُلُ الْكَهْفِ 穴居人" |
||
| 1 | It is available in the guru overlay, and various others as well : https://gpo.zugaina.org/gui-apps/foot |
| 2 | |
| 3 | Regards, |
| 4 | Julien |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Dec 11, 2021, 03:33 by toraboracaveman@××××××××××.com: |
| 8 | |
| 9 | > why doesn't portage have foot? for wayland, it |
| 10 | > seems the better choice than alacritty and kitty |
| 11 | > (which are available in portage). |
| 12 | > |
| 13 | > ty, |
| 14 | > cm. |
| 15 | > |