Archives
Archives
| From: | "caveman رَجُلُ الْكَهْفِ 穴居人" <toraboracaveman@××××××××××.com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gentoo <gentoo-user@l.g.o> |
| Subject: | [gentoo-user] foot terminal not in portage? |
| Date: | Sat, 11 Dec 2021 03:35:15 |
| Message-Id: | X6Ar7FjF8SXrijuaxl3LdRADldA-za9hlvEMq1SEtIUs94-S2ICZRRJSmoY7YcZNj89nxGJhUp70Q7KQ0qS7cPUWgumQ3tB6jknIX5oyVoI=@protonmail.com |
| 1 | why doesn't portage have foot? for wayland, it |
| 2 | seems the better choice than alacritty and kitty |
| 3 | (which are available in portage). |
| 4 | |
| 5 | ty, |
| 6 | cm. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] foot terminal not in portage? | Ralph Seichter <ralph@×××××××××××.de> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] foot terminal not in portage? | Julien Roy <julien@××××.ca> |