| 1 |
On Monday 23 Jan 2012 23:34:00 Mervyn Hammer wrote: |
| 2 |
> Thanks for your replies. |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> > Am 23.01.2012 23:03, schrieb walt: |
| 5 |
> > > Very strange indeed. I just installed both packages and I have no |
| 6 |
> > > libmix.so.0 either, yet everything works. |
| 7 |
> > > |
| 8 |
> > > No idea what's causing your problem, but I agree it's a problem I'd |
| 9 |
> > > want to solve. I'd try running ldconfig -p and lddtree /usr/bin/nc |
| 10 |
> > > to see where the .0 is coming from. (lddtree is from pax-utils). |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> For completeness: |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> (for dev-libs/libmix-2.05-r5 after symlink created) |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> ldconfig -p | grep libmix = |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> libmix.so.0 (libc6) => /usr/lib/libmix.so.0 |
| 19 |
> libmix++.so.0 (libc6) => /usr/lib/libmix++.so.0 |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> and output from lddtree /usr/bin/nc = |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> nc => /usr/bin/nc (interpreter => /lib/ld-linux.so.2) |
| 24 |
> libmix.so.0 => /usr/lib/libmix.so.0 |
| 25 |
> libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> * Felix Kuperjans <felix@××××××××××××××.com> [2012-01-23 23:13:26 +0100]: |
| 28 |
> > I ran into this problem some time ago, it seems the ebuild |
| 29 |
> > dev-libs/libmix-2.05-r5 is broken. It does no longer create a symlink |
| 30 |
> > from libmix.so.0 to libmix.so. |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> Though it worked with the symlink, as you suggested, I upgraded libmix |
| 33 |
> anyway. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Hmm ... strange. |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
I have dev-libs/libmix-2.05-r5 and I also have the symlink: |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
$ ls -la /usr/lib64/libmix* |
| 41 |
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 5752 Mar 25 2011 /usr/lib64/libmix++.so |
| 42 |
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Mar 25 2011 /usr/lib64/libmix++.so.0 -> |
| 43 |
libmix++.so |
| 44 |
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 98352 Mar 25 2011 /usr/lib64/libmix.so |
| 45 |
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 Mar 25 2011 /usr/lib64/libmix.so.0 -> libmix.so |
| 46 |
-- |
| 47 |
Regards, |
| 48 |
Mick |
Archives