1 |
Thanks for your replies. |
2 |
|
3 |
> Am 23.01.2012 23:03, schrieb walt: |
4 |
> > Very strange indeed. I just installed both packages and I have no |
5 |
> > libmix.so.0 either, yet everything works. |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > No idea what's causing your problem, but I agree it's a problem I'd |
8 |
> > want to solve. I'd try running ldconfig -p and lddtree /usr/bin/nc |
9 |
> > to see where the .0 is coming from. (lddtree is from pax-utils). |
10 |
|
11 |
For completeness: |
12 |
|
13 |
(for dev-libs/libmix-2.05-r5 after symlink created) |
14 |
|
15 |
ldconfig -p | grep libmix = |
16 |
|
17 |
libmix.so.0 (libc6) => /usr/lib/libmix.so.0 |
18 |
libmix++.so.0 (libc6) => /usr/lib/libmix++.so.0 |
19 |
|
20 |
and output from lddtree /usr/bin/nc = |
21 |
|
22 |
nc => /usr/bin/nc (interpreter => /lib/ld-linux.so.2) |
23 |
libmix.so.0 => /usr/lib/libmix.so.0 |
24 |
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 |
25 |
|
26 |
* Felix Kuperjans <felix@××××××××××××××.com> [2012-01-23 23:13:26 +0100]: |
27 |
> I ran into this problem some time ago, it seems the ebuild |
28 |
> dev-libs/libmix-2.05-r5 is broken. It does no longer create a symlink |
29 |
> from libmix.so.0 to libmix.so. |
30 |
|
31 |
Though it worked with the symlink, as you suggested, I upgraded libmix |
32 |
anyway. |
33 |
|
34 |
Thanks again. |
35 |
|
36 |
Regards, |
37 |
|
38 |
-- |
39 |
Merv Hammer |