Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Mervyn Hammer <mrhammer@×××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: netcat and libmix.so.0 curiosity
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 23:35:29
Message-Id: 20120123233400.GC3912@devbox1.at.home
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: netcat and libmix.so.0 curiosity by Felix Kuperjans
1 Thanks for your replies.
2
3 > Am 23.01.2012 23:03, schrieb walt:
4 > > Very strange indeed. I just installed both packages and I have no
5 > > libmix.so.0 either, yet everything works.
6 > >
7 > > No idea what's causing your problem, but I agree it's a problem I'd
8 > > want to solve. I'd try running ldconfig -p and lddtree /usr/bin/nc
9 > > to see where the .0 is coming from. (lddtree is from pax-utils).
10
11 For completeness:
12
13 (for dev-libs/libmix-2.05-r5 after symlink created)
14
15 ldconfig -p | grep libmix =
16
17 libmix.so.0 (libc6) => /usr/lib/libmix.so.0
18 libmix++.so.0 (libc6) => /usr/lib/libmix++.so.0
19
20 and output from lddtree /usr/bin/nc =
21
22 nc => /usr/bin/nc (interpreter => /lib/ld-linux.so.2)
23 libmix.so.0 => /usr/lib/libmix.so.0
24 libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6
25
26 * Felix Kuperjans <felix@××××××××××××××.com> [2012-01-23 23:13:26 +0100]:
27 > I ran into this problem some time ago, it seems the ebuild
28 > dev-libs/libmix-2.05-r5 is broken. It does no longer create a symlink
29 > from libmix.so.0 to libmix.so.
30
31 Though it worked with the symlink, as you suggested, I upgraded libmix
32 anyway.
33
34 Thanks again.
35
36 Regards,
37
38 --
39 Merv Hammer

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: netcat and libmix.so.0 curiosity Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com>