1 |
Neil Bothwick: |
2 |
> On Tue, 20 Dec 2016 23:11:08 +0100, lee wrote: |
3 |
> > >> But you already heard of udev rules? I guess I mentioned them |
4 |
> > >> already. They are not so hard to write and they only need to be |
5 |
> > >> written once. |
6 |
> > > It's too late by then, if eth0 and eth1 already exist, you cannot |
7 |
> > > switch them with udev rules - as anyone who had worked with dual NICs |
8 |
> > > would have discovered. |
9 |
> > Can you switch them when they have unrecognisable names? |
10 |
> You can't switch any two names because the udev rules are run singly, so |
11 |
> at one point you will be trying to rename an interface with a name that |
12 |
> is already in use. |
13 |
... |
14 |
|
15 |
Not everyone runs udev, and you don't need udev to change the eth name, |
16 |
a few other choises are presented here: |
17 |
|
18 |
https://ivi.fnwi.uva.nl/sne/air//wiki/LogicalInterfaceNames/ |
19 |
|
20 |
Regards, |
21 |
/Karl Hammar |
22 |
|
23 |
----------------------------------------------------------------------- |
24 |
Aspö Data |
25 |
Lilla Aspö 148 |
26 |
S-742 94 Östhammar |
27 |
Sweden |
28 |
+46 173 140 57 |