| 1 |
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 07:28, Thomas Kear wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> The real advantage that initng posesses are, unless runit's website |
| 4 |
> is simply failing to mention it, auto-restarting of failed daemons, |
| 5 |
> virtual dependencies, and clever multi-distro compatible scripts that |
| 6 |
> use a preprocessor at install time (see the #ifd / #elsed / #endd |
| 7 |
> statements in a file like |
| 8 |
> http://svn.initng.org/initng-ifiles/trunk/initfiles/system/modules.ii |
| 9 |
>). |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I've used runit for a little while. It uses daemontools from qmail to |
| 12 |
monitor services. Hence it also has auto-restarting of failed daemons. |
| 13 |
I haven't used it long enough to know about dependencies though. I |
| 14 |
thought runit was pretty good. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
---------------------------------------- |
| 18 |
Mrugesh Karnik |
| 19 |
GPG Key 0xBA6F1DA8 |
| 20 |
Public key on http://wwwkeys.pgp.net |
| 21 |
---------------------------------------- |
Archives