1 |
Use rsync. I am not sure how much gain there is to be had but try using |
2 |
an older version as the seed file - should save at least a little. |
3 |
Creative use of head/tail with seed files and already downloaded |
4 |
portions can save a lot if the link drops out halfway. |
5 |
|
6 |
Make sure you use the -P option (read "man rsync") e.g. "rsync -Pv |
7 |
--stats --bwlimit=2 filename ." wget has a similar option. BB (Before |
8 |
Broadband!) I set this for both wget and rsync in /etc/make.conf. wget |
9 |
will usually download faster on high quality connections than rsync, but |
10 |
overall, if you have a seed file, rsync wins hands down. |
11 |
|
12 |
The bandwidth option is useful if you still want to use the link whilst |
13 |
downloading. Both rsync and wget request chunks of the file, then wait |
14 |
an amount of time before getting the next chunk. This averages out to |
15 |
the required throughput, but some apps did not deal with this very well |
16 |
(p[arrallel scp downloads slowed to a crawl for instance, leaving a |
17 |
large part of the available bw unused. |
18 |
|
19 |
Best bet in this case is to try and find a local person with broadband |
20 |
who will download and burn to cd for you. I used to use a modem for |
21 |
gentoo for a few years and know what you are up against - but I think |
22 |
its worse for the binary distros as I found I was downloading whole CD's |
23 |
on a regular basis - and thats a whole lot worse than OO! |
24 |
|
25 |
BillK |
26 |
|
27 |
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 07:49 -0600, Dale wrote: |
28 |
> Ernie Schroder wrote: |
29 |
> ...> |
30 |
> Well, this is what I have to worry about: |
31 |
... |
32 |
-- |
33 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |