Archives
Archives
| From: | "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@×××××.net> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: What is up with the new "domainname" situation? | ||
| Date: | Tue, 19 Sep 2006 12:57:30 | ||
| Message-Id: | 450FE7EC.6040909@veldy.net | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: What is up with the new "domainname" situation? by Neil Bothwick |
||
| 1 | Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 2 | > Have you set the dns_domain in conf.d/net? |
| 3 | > |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | I have tried this and it does NOT work. |
| 6 | >> |
| 7 | >> I'm afraid it gives nothing! |
| 8 | >> |
| 9 | > |
| 10 | > It sounds like dns_domain is not set. |
| 11 | > |
| 12 | > |
| 13 | Considering that I have tried it ... I know it not to work, so I have |
| 14 | little doubt that he tried it himself. This isn't hard to reproduce |
| 15 | guys .... |
| 16 | |
| 17 | Tom |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: What is up with the new "domainname" situation? | Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: What is up with the new "domainname" situation? | Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> |