| 1 |
Apparently, though unproven, at 00:13 on Saturday 23 October 2010, Neil |
| 2 |
Bothwick did opine thusly: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:52:18 -0500, Dale wrote: |
| 5 |
> > That was what I recalled about the openrc discussion too. It is coming |
| 6 |
> > but just not sure when. Me, I'm not switching until it starts getting |
| 7 |
> > closer to that time. It, like some of the newer versions of portage, |
| 8 |
> > appears to be stable and is used by many people but is not marked |
| 9 |
> > stable yet. Both of those sort of confuse me sometimes. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> You're mixing two different definitions of stable. Portage 2.2 is |
| 12 |
> certainly reliable, but it is anything but stable with a new version |
| 13 |
> coming out every day at the moment,. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I'm waiting for tomorrow when my regularly scheduled portage update hits |
| 17 |
_rc100. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
I guess we'll see then if portage has any rollover bugs in it's version number |
| 20 |
code or not :-) |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
Archives