1 |
Jerry McBride schreef: |
2 |
> On Tuesday 05 July 2005 06:00 pm, creighto@××××××.org wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>>Trying to Migrate to 2.6. But when I reboot into my new genkerneled |
5 |
>>system, I cannot use X.org anymore, it complains about agpgart not |
6 |
>>working. Even If I modprobe the kernel mod or even compile it in directly |
7 |
>>it rejects it. |
8 |
>>Any Ideas on how to proceed? |
9 |
>> |
10 |
>>Creighton |
11 |
> |
12 |
> |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Without seeing the xorg logfile from /var/logs... I'd say you ahve to |
15 |
> re-emerge xorg or at the least run revdep-rebuild -p to see whta has to get |
16 |
> upgraded also. |
17 |
> |
18 |
|
19 |
I question whether that would work, without knowing what hardware |
20 |
(motherboard, videocard) is involved, especially when I hear the word |
21 |
'genkernel'. |
22 |
|
23 |
To me, errors in agpgart first suggest that either support for your |
24 |
motherboard's agp chipset is not compiled into the kernel, or --if |
25 |
compiled as a module, is not loaded; and secondly, the outside chance |
26 |
that-- if using an ATI card-- the InternalAGPGART setting is wrong; set |
27 |
to YES when it should be set to NO because you have to use your |
28 |
motherboard's kernel module (but this does not usually result in X.org |
29 |
not starting, just complaints in the logs), or set to NO when it should |
30 |
be set to YES because you don't use your motherboard's kernel support, |
31 |
so no agpgart is being loaded at all (which I would imagine would |
32 |
prevent X from starting). |
33 |
|
34 |
What does dmesg or /var/log/messages say about agpgart? Did it try to |
35 |
load and fail? What does lsmod say is loaded? If nothing, can you |
36 |
modprobe your agpgart module? What is your mobo and video card? If an |
37 |
ATI or nVidia video card, did you re-emerge the drivers after compiling |
38 |
the kernel? |
39 |
|
40 |
Basically, I'd just like to confirm that genkernel didn't drop the ball. |
41 |
|
42 |
Holly |
43 |
|
44 |
-- |
45 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |