Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Pandu Poluan <pandu@××××××.info>
To: gentoo-user <Gentoo-user@l.g.o>
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Filesystem with lowest CPU load, acceptable emerge performance, and stable?
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:55:36
Message-Id: CAA2qdGXeX=cDB06tZbgz1FfRauG+u06faT5Dcjzq=E8eSie29w@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Filesystem with lowest CPU load, acceptable emerge performance, and stable? by Pandu Poluan
1 Sorry, forgot one thing: For the time being, I'm sticking with
2 2.6.39-hardened. Saw too many incompatibility bug with 3.0 (due to
3 packages hard-wired to expect the kernel version to begin with "2.6").
4
5 Rgds,
6
7
8 On 2011-09-07, Pandu Poluan <pandu@××××××.info> wrote:
9 > So, can anyone recommend me a filesystem that fulfills my following needs:
10 >
11 > Scenario: vFirewall (virtual Firewall) that is going to be deployed at
12 > my IaaS Cloud Provider.
13 >
14 > Disk I/O Characteristic: Occasional writes during 'normal' usage,
15 > once-a-week eix-sync + emerge -avuD
16 >
17 > Priority: Stable (i.e., less chance of corruption), least CPU usage.
18 >
19 > My Google-Fu seems to indicate either XFS or JFS; what do you think?
20 >
21 > Rgds,
22 >
23 >
24 > --
25 > --
26 > Pandu E Poluan - IT Optimizer
27 > My website: http://pandu.poluan.info/
28 >
29
30
31 --
32 --
33 Pandu E Poluan - IT Optimizer
34 My website: http://pandu.poluan.info/

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Filesystem with lowest CPU load, acceptable emerge performance, and stable? Florian Philipp <lists@×××××××××××.net>