From: | Pandu Poluan <pandu@××××××.info> |
---|---|
To: | gentoo-user <Gentoo-user@l.g.o> |
Subject: | [gentoo-user] Filesystem with lowest CPU load, acceptable emerge performance, and stable? |
Date: | Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:27:28 |
Message-Id: | CAA2qdGVMWtq2jxECcd9ceppT-9jmo3gXbw6f7dhx1GjtOfKGkQ@mail.gmail.com |
1 | So, can anyone recommend me a filesystem that fulfills my following needs: |
2 | |
3 | Scenario: vFirewall (virtual Firewall) that is going to be deployed at |
4 | my IaaS Cloud Provider. |
5 | |
6 | Disk I/O Characteristic: Occasional writes during 'normal' usage, |
7 | once-a-week eix-sync + emerge -avuD |
8 | |
9 | Priority: Stable (i.e., less chance of corruption), least CPU usage. |
10 | |
11 | My Google-Fu seems to indicate either XFS or JFS; what do you think? |
12 | |
13 | Rgds, |
14 | |
15 | |
16 | -- |
17 | -- |
18 | Pandu E Poluan - IT Optimizer |
19 | My website: http://pandu.poluan.info/ |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
[gentoo-user] Re: Filesystem with lowest CPU load, acceptable emerge performance, and stable? | Pandu Poluan <pandu@××××××.info> |
Re: [gentoo-user] Filesystem with lowest CPU load, acceptable emerge performance, and stable? | kashani <kashani-list@××××××××.net> |
Re: [gentoo-user] Filesystem with lowest CPU load, acceptable emerge performance, and stable? | Permjacov Evgeniy <permeakra@×××××.com> |
Re: [gentoo-user] Filesystem with lowest CPU load, acceptable emerge performance, and stable? | Andrea Conti <alyf@××××.net> |
Re: [gentoo-user] Filesystem with lowest CPU load, acceptable emerge performance, and stable? | Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> |