| 1 |
On Monday 13 September 2010 20:37:13 Stéphane Guedon wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Monday 13 September 2010 20:28:07 J. Roeleveld wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Monday 13 September 2010 20:15:24 Stéphane Guedon wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > On Monday 13 September 2010 21:06:48 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > > On 09/13/2010 09:15 AM, Stéphane Guedon wrote: |
| 6 |
> > > > > Since few days ( two or three ?), every time I launch emerge, |
| 7 |
> > > > > it's |
| 8 |
> > > > > saying me it needs an update of portage itself. |
| 9 |
> > > > > In plus, I have upgraded udev at least two times (160>161>162 |
| 10 |
> > > > > today)... |
| 11 |
> > > > > |
| 12 |
> > > > > Plus, I have had two warning message concerning updates : sudo |
| 13 |
> > > > > and an |
| 14 |
> > > > > other... |
| 15 |
> > > > > |
| 16 |
> > > > > what's going on ? Is somebody founding security holes "à la |
| 17 |
> > > > > pelle" |
| 18 |
> > > > > (french expression). |
| 19 |
> > > > |
| 20 |
> > > > emerge -al1 portage |
| 21 |
> > > > |
| 22 |
> > > > (Note the "l" option.) |
| 23 |
> > > |
| 24 |
> > > today, one more ! portage to the 2.1.9.4 if I remember exactly ! |
| 25 |
> > |
| 26 |
> > Do you have "ACCEPT_KEYWORDS" set to something starting with a "~..."? |
| 27 |
> > |
| 28 |
> > If yes, then you can expect regular updates to further "unstable" |
| 29 |
> > versions. |
| 30 |
> > |
| 31 |
> > -- |
| 32 |
> > Joost |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> yes, of course... but... one release per day ? strange isn't it ? |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
I wouldn't expect people to run a Gentoo system with all packages on unstable. |
| 37 |
I tend to only select specific packages as unstable when I really need that |
| 38 |
version. |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
I wouldn't be surprised to have to upgrade a substantial set of packages on a |
| 41 |
daily basis with that setting. |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
Why do you specify you want the latest versions and then get surprised when |
| 44 |
you get new updates on a daily basis? |
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
-- |
| 47 |
Joost |
Archives