| 1 |
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 11:00:39 +0200 |
| 2 |
Joerg.Schilling@××××××××××××××××.de (Joerg Schilling) wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> "b.n." <brullonulla@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> > Daniel Iliev ha scritto: |
| 7 |
> > > How about if you remake your site and explain everything there. |
| 8 |
> > > What happened (chronologically and in detail) and provide |
| 9 |
> > > evidence. Remake it to be clear with simple sentences and easy |
| 10 |
> > > for finding the information. Then provide means (as web forum, |
| 11 |
> > > mailing list etc) for the visitors to post their comments and |
| 12 |
> > > questions. After all that is ready it would absolutely acceptable |
| 13 |
> > > to participate in this and every other public list as a normal |
| 14 |
> > > member and put links to your site in your signature. |
| 15 |
> > > |
| 16 |
> > > How about that? |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> > I want that too. I back the proposal of Iliev. Joerg, why don't you |
| 19 |
> > do that so that you can settle all this in the most informative way |
| 20 |
> > possible? |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> I pointed you to the FAQ and I asked you to tell me what questions |
| 23 |
> remain unanswered. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Sorry, never saw the message in which you ask what more info to |
| 27 |
publish. Perhaps I didn't receive it. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> I am sorry but I can only extend information if people tell me which |
| 31 |
> information they like to see. |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Actually you can figure out which are the most FAQ from this thread, but |
| 35 |
let me help you for the start. Please, publish detailed information |
| 36 |
for the following events in chronological order: |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
- When the first contact with the attackers took place and what was |
| 39 |
the reason for that contact |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
- When the first attack took place and what (you suppose if you don't |
| 42 |
know for sure) was the reason for the attack. Describe the attack |
| 43 |
itself - what were the actions of those who attacked you |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
- When other attacks (if any) took place. Describe them. |
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
- When you changed the license. For what reason. Explain, please, why |
| 48 |
there is no problem to mix GPL with CDDL (for me personally it is the |
| 49 |
most interesting part) |
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
- When the fork was launched |
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
- The exact statement of the lawyers you consulted |
| 54 |
|
| 55 |
- Any evidence (e-mails, posts to web forums, blogs, |
| 56 |
publications, etc) or reference to that evidence that you can |
| 57 |
provide |
| 58 |
|
| 59 |
|
| 60 |
That's what I could think off for the moment, but I'm sure others |
| 61 |
will fill in the gaps I've left. |
| 62 |
|
| 63 |
|
| 64 |
-- |
| 65 |
Best regards, |
| 66 |
Daniel |
| 67 |
-- |
| 68 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives