| 1 |
JFS is very soft on cpu usage, and ext4 does a very good job overall. |
| 2 |
fsck times for ext4 makes it probably the best choice for a server, |
| 3 |
plus it has more eyes watching over it. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
In any case, I wanted to call your attention that this might not be |
| 6 |
the best choice anyway. If you truly want portage to have the minimum |
| 7 |
possible impact on the performance of your machine(s) you should |
| 8 |
probably be using other machine(s) to build binary packages, then use |
| 9 |
these package in the target system(s) (i.e. with emerge -K). |
| 10 |
-- |
| 11 |
Jesús Guerrero Botella |
Archives