1 |
Ow Mun Heng wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
>On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 17:50 +0200, Jakub Krajcovic wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> |
6 |
>>Hi Guys, |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>>the subject says it all, but i'll go into more detail now, if anyone |
9 |
>>would be interested in helping. I currently have my system installed on |
10 |
>>2 40GB IDE drives. They are in an LVM volumegroup, and the 2 drives are |
11 |
>>striped. What i need to do is transform this "striped disk cluster" |
12 |
>>into a mirror. (preferably using the most cheapest and painless |
13 |
>>method). I kind of know my way around LVM, so i don't really need a |
14 |
>>_totally_ detailed answer, but i need to know, if this that i am trying |
15 |
>>to accomplish is |
16 |
>>a) possible |
17 |
>>b) what are the steps that i should follow in order to do this? |
18 |
>> |
19 |
>>I was thinking like this: use pvmove or something to move all of the |
20 |
>>pv's from one disk to the other, then reduce the volumegroup (remove |
21 |
>>the disk eg physical volume from it) add it as a mirror... |
22 |
>> |
23 |
>> |
24 |
> |
25 |
>Seems to me the best way to do this would be a third Disk. Is this an |
26 |
>option?? |
27 |
> |
28 |
Personally, I'd just get two more disks and turn it into a RAID 0+1 |
29 |
setup. If you've got the space, the money and the Molex connectors, I'd |
30 |
go for it. |
31 |
|
32 |
Or just get one more disk, backup your data, create a three-drive RAID 5 |
33 |
volume and then copy it all back. |
34 |
|
35 |
RAID 0+1 would be easier to setup, require much less overhead and have |
36 |
more fault-tolerance than a three-disk RAID 5 setup. However, it's more |
37 |
expensive (you need two more disks instead of one more) and it's not as |
38 |
cool-sounding as "RAID 5." :-P |
39 |
|
40 |
-- |
41 |
Colin |
42 |
|
43 |
-- |
44 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |