| 1 |
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Jorge Almeida <jjalmeida@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Kerin Millar <kerframil@×××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 29/09/2014 16:10, Jorge Almeida wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
>>>>> I'm having a somewhat disgusting issue on my Gentoo: binaries are |
| 7 |
>>>>> unaccountably large. |
| 8 |
>>>> |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> You might consider making contact with the toolchain herd at gentoo or |
| 12 |
>> filing a bug. I, for one, would be interested to know the outcome. |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
> Well, I suppose this one is the list every gentooer subscribes to, and |
| 15 |
> I would like to be sure I'm not making something silly before filing a |
| 16 |
> bug... |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Meanwhile, I tried compiling with clang. It produces similar sizes in |
| 19 |
> Gentoo and in LFS (same i3 computer), although about 200B larger than |
| 20 |
> in Slackware/atom. So, it really seems to be a gcc issue. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> thanks |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> Jorge |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Just the off the top of my head thoughts on how I'd approach this. GCC |
| 28 |
has the option to not clean up its temp files used during the build, |
| 29 |
as well as outputting annotated assembly mid-build. The latter might |
| 30 |
be the most enlightening on what's being treated differently in the |
| 31 |
output of the various systems. I don't use those tricks often enough |
| 32 |
to remember what flags are what off the top of my head, since I only |
| 33 |
really dig that deep when playing with my avr based toys, but just a |
| 34 |
couple ideas I thought I'd pass along. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
Poison [BLX] |
| 38 |
Joshua M. Murphy |
Archives