1 |
Neil Bothwick schrieb: |
2 |
> On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 22:51:43 +0200, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> Now I read about the fact that -O3 results in bigger binaries and isn't |
5 |
>> at all guaranteed to give me a faster system. The bigger files result in |
6 |
>> more load on IO, so this tells me that it puts the load on the |
7 |
>> (relatively slow) 5400 rpm HDD I have in my laptop. OTOH I have "only" |
8 |
>> 512 MB RAM in there so it seems interesting to me to go the -O2 way of |
9 |
>> doing Gentoo ... |
10 |
> |
11 |
> I agree with Richard's response to the other other parts of your mail, but |
12 |
> I'd also add that -O2 may not be the best setting for your system. -Os |
13 |
> applies some of the optimisations of -O3 but also optimises for size. It |
14 |
> is often the best setting for systems with slow memory and disk I/O, i.e. |
15 |
> laptops. |
16 |
|
17 |
After sending my initial posting I thought I should have mentioned the |
18 |
details of that laptop, as there are older and newer, slower and faster |
19 |
ones ... |
20 |
|
21 |
I think mine is somehow middleclass these days (correct me ...): |
22 |
|
23 |
Acer TM 634 |
24 |
P4-M 1.8GHz (cpu family : 15, model : 2) |
25 |
512 MB RAM |
26 |
30 GB 5200 rpm HDD |
27 |
|
28 |
So it is not *that* constrained in terms of RAM and disk, I assume. |
29 |
|
30 |
But I am also ready to go the -Os-way if you recommend/suggest it for my |
31 |
system. |
32 |
|
33 |
Thanks a lot, Stefan. |
34 |
|
35 |
|
36 |
|
37 |
|
38 |
-- |
39 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |