[gentoo-user] Re: gcc upgrade

Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> writes:

> On Wednesday 14 July 2010 05:49:48 Valmor de Almeida wrote:
>> Mark Knecht wrote:
>> > On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com> wrote:
>> >> On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 4:52 AM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>
>> >> wrote: <SNIP>
>> >>
>> >>> Unless he's the kind of guy who likes to rip his Ferrari apart for
>> >>> kicks and put it all back together again so that not even the factory
>> >>> can notice...
>> >>
>> >> Precisely... :-)
>> >
>> > Oh, and besides liking the smell of fresh baked 1 and 0's in the
>> > morning emerge -e @world was an easy  way to solve my libpng problem.
>> > Woke up this morning to a freshly baked Gentoo machine.
>> >
>> > - Mark
>>
>> Exactly. My Ferrari is back with a brand new engine and no libpng issue.
>
>
> Lets follow this logic.
>
> You blindly wanted to re-emerge all of world because an over-reaching gcc
> upgrade guide said so. Coincidentally, there was a monumental libpng cock-up
> hanging around which emerge -e world just happened to fix.

And which could have been solved with revdep-rebuild (or at least
running it here after removing the previous version solved it - I just
followed flameeyes guide).

Emerge -e was like buying a new car when it would have been cheaper and
easier to just replace the fault part(s).

-- 
Nuno J. Silva
gopher://sdf-eu.org/1/users/njsg