Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: gcc upgrade
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 14:56:21
Message-Id: 201007141652.39389.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: gcc upgrade by Valmor de Almeida
1 On Wednesday 14 July 2010 05:49:48 Valmor de Almeida wrote:
2 > Mark Knecht wrote:
3 > > On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com> wrote:
4 > >> On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 4:52 AM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>
5 > >> wrote: <SNIP>
6 > >>
7 > >>> Unless he's the kind of guy who likes to rip his Ferrari apart for
8 > >>> kicks and put it all back together again so that not even the factory
9 > >>> can notice...
10 > >>
11 > >> Precisely... :-)
12 > >
13 > > Oh, and besides liking the smell of fresh baked 1 and 0's in the
14 > > morning emerge -e @world was an easy way to solve my libpng problem.
15 > > Woke up this morning to a freshly baked Gentoo machine.
16 > >
17 > > - Mark
18 >
19 > Exactly. My Ferrari is back with a brand new engine and no libpng issue.
20
21
22 Lets follow this logic.
23
24 You blindly wanted to re-emerge all of world because an over-reaching gcc
25 upgrade guide said so. Coincidentally, there was a monumental libpng cock-up
26 hanging around which emerge -e world just happened to fix.
27
28 And this somehow validates the gcc upgrade guide?
29
30 You just happened to have a fortunate side-effect at the right time. Doesn't
31 change the fact that the author of the guide wrote a misleading document.
32
33 --
34 alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-user] Re: gcc upgrade nunojsilva@ist.utl.pt (Nuno J. Silva)