1 |
On Wednesday 14 July 2010 05:49:48 Valmor de Almeida wrote: |
2 |
> Mark Knecht wrote: |
3 |
> > On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
> >> On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 4:52 AM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> |
5 |
> >> wrote: <SNIP> |
6 |
> >> |
7 |
> >>> Unless he's the kind of guy who likes to rip his Ferrari apart for |
8 |
> >>> kicks and put it all back together again so that not even the factory |
9 |
> >>> can notice... |
10 |
> >> |
11 |
> >> Precisely... :-) |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > Oh, and besides liking the smell of fresh baked 1 and 0's in the |
14 |
> > morning emerge -e @world was an easy way to solve my libpng problem. |
15 |
> > Woke up this morning to a freshly baked Gentoo machine. |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > - Mark |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Exactly. My Ferrari is back with a brand new engine and no libpng issue. |
20 |
|
21 |
|
22 |
Lets follow this logic. |
23 |
|
24 |
You blindly wanted to re-emerge all of world because an over-reaching gcc |
25 |
upgrade guide said so. Coincidentally, there was a monumental libpng cock-up |
26 |
hanging around which emerge -e world just happened to fix. |
27 |
|
28 |
And this somehow validates the gcc upgrade guide? |
29 |
|
30 |
You just happened to have a fortunate side-effect at the right time. Doesn't |
31 |
change the fact that the author of the guide wrote a misleading document. |
32 |
|
33 |
-- |
34 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |