From: | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] tuxonice and suspend-to-ram | ||
Date: | Wed, 02 Feb 2011 08:44:02 | ||
Message-Id: | 20110202084146.0c19bcfd@digimed.co.uk | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] tuxonice and suspend-to-ram by "Stefan G. Weichinger" |
1 | On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 08:17:11 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: |
2 | |
3 | > > Tuxonice also includes kernel patches, so it isn't only using what the |
4 | > > kernel provides. You can use the tuxonice scripts with a vanilla |
5 | > > kernel, you just miss out on the extra features. |
6 | > |
7 | > Sure. But what are the extras in S2R-context? What do I miss? |
8 | |
9 | The most obvious is the ability to abort a suspend or resume. |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-user] tuxonice and suspend-to-ram | "Stefan G. Weichinger" <lists@×××××.at> |