1 |
On Friday 19 January 2007 12:05, Hans-Werner Hilse wrote: |
2 |
> Those are not important in any case where the budget dictates matters |
3 |
> (i.e. everywhere). Those aren't even good things to bring into play |
4 |
> against RH and FBSD, because those do that fine, too. |
5 |
|
6 |
IMHO the only really compelling reason for ever using Gentoo is that at |
7 |
almost all times you get exactly what you want, as opposed to what Red |
8 |
Hat/Debian/et al wants you to have. |
9 |
|
10 |
Red Hat works well if you fall into that category of customer/company |
11 |
that is OK with using a stock standard middle-of-the road distro - this |
12 |
is easily 95%+ of the market. But, if you need something different, you |
13 |
will find that modifying RHEL is a major PITA compared to doing the |
14 |
same thing on Gentoo. For example, I work for a database company and we |
15 |
are a Red Hat partner. I simply will not support our products if they |
16 |
run on anything other than RHEL or SLES, because I don't want the |
17 |
hassle. But all my personal machines and my company notebook run |
18 |
Gentoo, because part of my job is keeping up with new stuff and only |
19 |
Gentoo gets out of the way and lets me do this without restricting me. |
20 |
|
21 |
So I suppose saf's real question ought to be something like "what do we |
22 |
really need that is hard to provide using other (mostly) binary |
23 |
distros?" |
24 |
|
25 |
alan |
26 |
|
27 |
-- |
28 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |