1 |
Hi, Walter. |
2 |
|
3 |
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 04:09:46AM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote: |
4 |
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 06:22:39PM -0500, Dale wrote |
5 |
|
6 |
> > I think mdev has shown it can be fixed. Given time, it just may replace |
7 |
> > udev then the udev dev can screw up his own stuff on not bother other |
8 |
> > distros. I'm giving mdev some thought here. I want /usr on LVM which |
9 |
> > means it has to be separate. |
10 |
|
11 |
> Sorry, in lste-breaking news, it looks like udev is a mandatory |
12 |
> dependancy for lvm2. No udev ==> No lvm2 |
13 |
|
14 |
I can mount and use my lvm2 partitions under mdev. As I said, I don't |
15 |
yet know whether lvm2's full functionality is available. |
16 |
|
17 |
I suspect there'll be quite a few packages which list udev as a |
18 |
dependency, yet work well enough under mdev. |
19 |
|
20 |
> Can you run a test for me? What happens when you... |
21 |
|
22 |
> 1) insert the line |
23 |
> sys-fs/udev |
24 |
> into /etc/portage/package.mask |
25 |
|
26 |
> 2) execute "emerge -pv system" |
27 |
|
28 |
> 3) execute "emerge -pv world" |
29 |
|
30 |
> 4) Remember to remove the "sys-fs/udev" line from package.mask<G> |
31 |
|
32 |
> I expect that you should get an error message about not being able to |
33 |
> emerge lvm2 due to udev being masked. This is something I intend to add |
34 |
> to the instructions, so people can check ahead of time whether their |
35 |
> particular setup is able to run without udev. |
36 |
|
37 |
The solution to this, ugly though it might be, is to leave udev in the |
38 |
system so as to allow these other packages to be merged. |
39 |
|
40 |
> -- |
41 |
> Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> |
42 |
|
43 |
-- |
44 |
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany). |