| 1 |
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 08:14, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Pandu Poluan wrote: |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> I noticed Dale's email (hi Dale!) [1] asking about which gcc / glibc |
| 5 |
>> unstable to use. |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> Is there any consensus yet as to which 'gcc'? I'm planning on doing an |
| 8 |
>> `emerge -e @system` on two fresh installs, one x86 and the other |
| 9 |
>> amd64. |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> Should I go with 4.5.3? Or 4.5.2? Or play it safe and use 4.5.1-r1 |
| 12 |
>> (which, based on b.g.o search [2], seems to have less (serious) bugs |
| 13 |
>> compared to 4.5.2) |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Howdy, |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> I'm using this: |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> root@fireball / # equery list gcc glibc |
| 21 |
> * Searching for gcc ... |
| 22 |
> [IP-] [ ] sys-devel/gcc-4.4.5:4.4 |
| 23 |
> [IP-] [ ] sys-devel/gcc-4.5.3:4.5 |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
So, 4.5.3 is quite safe for day-to-day usage eh? |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Okay, keywording it. Thanks! |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
> * Searching for glibc ... |
| 31 |
> [IP-] [ ] sys-libs/glibc-2.13-r4:2.2 |
| 32 |
> root@fireball / # |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> The higher gcc is the one in use. Everything compiles fine. One thing tho, |
| 35 |
> I started a download and went to town. When I got back, I was sitting at my |
| 36 |
> grub menu. Most likely not related but wanted to mention juuuuuuuuust in |
| 37 |
> case. ;-) Yea, my reboot issues is happening again. :-@ |
| 38 |
> |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
Hmmm, just a hunch: Have you tried updating the motherboard's firmware? |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
Rgds, |
| 43 |
-- |
| 44 |
Pandu E Poluan |
| 45 |
~ IT Optimizer ~ |
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
• Blog : http://pepoluan.tumblr.com |
| 48 |
• Linked-In : http://id.linkedin.com/in/pepoluan |
Archives