Re: [gentoo-user] Which gcc unstable?

[Dale]

Pandu Poluan wrote:
> I noticed Dale's email (hi Dale!) [1] asking about which gcc / glibc
> unstable to use.
>
> Is there any consensus yet as to which 'gcc'? I'm planning on doing an
> `emerge -e @system` on two fresh installs, one x86 and the other
> amd64.
>
> Should I go with 4.5.3? Or 4.5.2? Or play it safe and use 4.5.1-r1
> (which, based on b.g.o search [2], seems to have less (serious) bugs
> compared to 4.5.2)
>
> [1] http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/user/234240
> [2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?order=Importance&short_desc=gcc&resolution=---&query_format=advanced&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=IN_PROGRESS&bug_status=RESOLVED&bug_status=VERIFIED&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr
>
> Rgds,
>
>
>

Howdy,

I'm using this:

root@fireball / # equery list gcc glibc
  * Searching for gcc ...
[IP-] [  ] sys-devel/gcc-4.4.5:4.4
[IP-] [  ] sys-devel/gcc-4.5.3:4.5

  * Searching for glibc ...
[IP-] [  ] sys-libs/glibc-2.13-r4:2.2
root@fireball / #

The higher gcc is the one in use.  Everything compiles fine.  One thing 
tho, I started a download and went to town.  When I got back, I was 
sitting at my grub menu.  Most likely not related but wanted to mention 
juuuuuuuuust in case.  ;-)  Yea, my reboot issues is happening again.  :-@

Dale

:-)  :-)