Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Can't fetch www-plugins/chrome-binary-plugins
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 22:46:43
Message-Id: CAJ0EP43LaWP7ynLu9M8T6ZS_h+ExeU_A-+bG0LQHSxuGoYVN4A@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Can't fetch www-plugins/chrome-binary-plugins by Rich Freeman
1 On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote:
2 > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 7:05 AM, Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote:
3 >> On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 06:20:25 +0000, Mick wrote:
4 >>
5 >>> > Google only keeps the latest versions so that ebuild is usually only
6 >>> > good for a short while after it gets marked stable.
7 >>> > Just keyword the unstable package.
8 >>>
9 >>> So users of the stable package have to be really fast, or lucky?
10 >>
11 >> Gentoo should keep a copy in its mirrors for as long as a current ebuild
12 >> needs it (unless the package is fetch-restricted).
13 >
14 > Chrome is mirror-restricted, because of:
15 >
16 > 9.2 Subject to section 1.2, you may not (and you may not permit anyone
17 > else to) copy, modify, create a derivative work of, reverse engineer,
18 > decompile or otherwise attempt to extract the source code of the
19 > Software or any part thereof, unless this is expressly permitted or
20 > required by law, or unless you have been specifically told that you may
21 > do so by Google, in writing.
22 >
23 > chrome-binary-plugins is not free software, or open source. There is
24 > little Gentoo can do when they keep changing the URL/hash without
25 > warning.
26 >
27 > You can file a bug to get the ebuild updated though.
28
29 As the person doing the bumps, I would actually prefer that people
30 ping me in IRC before creating a bug report. It's annoying to have to
31 close a bug report for an issue that occurs quite frequently.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Can't fetch www-plugins/chrome-binary-plugins Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com>