1 |
On Thursday 12 Mar 2015 22:46:14 Mike Gilbert wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 7:05 AM, Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
4 |
> >> On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 06:20:25 +0000, Mick wrote: |
5 |
> >>> > Google only keeps the latest versions so that ebuild is usually only |
6 |
> >>> > good for a short while after it gets marked stable. |
7 |
> >>> > Just keyword the unstable package. |
8 |
> >>> |
9 |
> >>> So users of the stable package have to be really fast, or lucky? |
10 |
> >> |
11 |
> >> Gentoo should keep a copy in its mirrors for as long as a current ebuild |
12 |
> >> needs it (unless the package is fetch-restricted). |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > Chrome is mirror-restricted, because of: |
15 |
> > 9.2 Subject to section 1.2, you may not (and you may not permit anyone |
16 |
> > else to) copy, modify, create a derivative work of, reverse engineer, |
17 |
> > decompile or otherwise attempt to extract the source code of the |
18 |
> > Software or any part thereof, unless this is expressly permitted or |
19 |
> > required by law, or unless you have been specifically told that you |
20 |
> > may do so by Google, in writing. |
21 |
> > |
22 |
> > chrome-binary-plugins is not free software, or open source. There is |
23 |
> > little Gentoo can do when they keep changing the URL/hash without |
24 |
> > warning. |
25 |
> > |
26 |
> > You can file a bug to get the ebuild updated though. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> As the person doing the bumps, I would actually prefer that people |
29 |
> ping me in IRC before creating a bug report. It's annoying to have to |
30 |
> close a bug report for an issue that occurs quite frequently. |
31 |
|
32 |
Don't mind doing this if it will help - what's your nick? |
33 |
|
34 |
-- |
35 |
Regards, |
36 |
Mick |