1 |
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> On Thursday 12 Mar 2015 22:46:14 Mike Gilbert wrote: |
3 |
>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
>> > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 7:05 AM, Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
5 |
>> >> On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 06:20:25 +0000, Mick wrote: |
6 |
>> >>> > Google only keeps the latest versions so that ebuild is usually only |
7 |
>> >>> > good for a short while after it gets marked stable. |
8 |
>> >>> > Just keyword the unstable package. |
9 |
>> >>> |
10 |
>> >>> So users of the stable package have to be really fast, or lucky? |
11 |
>> >> |
12 |
>> >> Gentoo should keep a copy in its mirrors for as long as a current ebuild |
13 |
>> >> needs it (unless the package is fetch-restricted). |
14 |
>> > |
15 |
>> > Chrome is mirror-restricted, because of: |
16 |
>> > 9.2 Subject to section 1.2, you may not (and you may not permit anyone |
17 |
>> > else to) copy, modify, create a derivative work of, reverse engineer, |
18 |
>> > decompile or otherwise attempt to extract the source code of the |
19 |
>> > Software or any part thereof, unless this is expressly permitted or |
20 |
>> > required by law, or unless you have been specifically told that you |
21 |
>> > may do so by Google, in writing. |
22 |
>> > |
23 |
>> > chrome-binary-plugins is not free software, or open source. There is |
24 |
>> > little Gentoo can do when they keep changing the URL/hash without |
25 |
>> > warning. |
26 |
>> > |
27 |
>> > You can file a bug to get the ebuild updated though. |
28 |
>> |
29 |
>> As the person doing the bumps, I would actually prefer that people |
30 |
>> ping me in IRC before creating a bug report. It's annoying to have to |
31 |
>> close a bug report for an issue that occurs quite frequently. |
32 |
> |
33 |
> Don't mind doing this if it will help - what's your nick? |
34 |
|
35 |
floppym -- same as my email address. |