1 |
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 14:26 +1000, Jake Moe wrote: |
2 |
> No, I was tempted to try genkernel, but again, OCD got the best of me; |
3 |
> I |
4 |
> like Gentoo because I tell it what I want and need, and it does that |
5 |
> and |
6 |
> nothing else. Genkernel, in my understand, does everything (and |
7 |
> apparently does it pretty well), but it means that it's bigger than it |
8 |
> needs to be. Plus, I hadn't gotten a reply back in a while, and I'm |
9 |
> limited on time with this laptop, so I went back to that which I know |
10 |
> better. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> And I thought the Live CD used genkernel; I thought that was where |
13 |
> genkernel came from in the first place? Is it different? |
14 |
|
15 |
I have no idea; I don't use genkernel. |
16 |
|
17 |
All I'm saying is if you can try booting on a kernel you know at least |
18 |
*should* work (such as the live cd or genkernel) and that works then at |
19 |
least you can deduce it down to kernel config. |
20 |
|
21 |
-a |