| 1 |
On 12/06/17 08:41, Mick wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wednesday, 6 December 2017 15:36:19 GMT Daniel Frey wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 12/05/17 23:00, Raffaele Belardi wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> One (~x86) LXDE system completed the switch with no problem, the other |
| 5 |
>>> (~amd64) built all except two packaged (sdlmame and torcs) which did not |
| 6 |
>>> build with gcc-7.2 even before the switch to 17.0. |
| 7 |
>>> |
| 8 |
>>> Gentoo devs and arch testers did a good job as usual. |
| 9 |
>>> |
| 10 |
>>> I'll do the switch on the Gnome system in the next days but up to now I |
| 11 |
>>> can say that the switch to 17.0 is a _lot_ less painful than switching |
| 12 |
>>> major compiler version. |
| 13 |
>>> |
| 14 |
>>> raffaele |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>> I've done two machines now (6 more to go!) and it's been mostly |
| 17 |
>> painless. I had the grub and cdrdao rebuild problems, solved by |
| 18 |
>> upgrading to grub2 and applying a patch to lame for cdrdao. I also had |
| 19 |
>> pygtk fail, but once the `emerge -e world` finished, I just had to |
| 20 |
>> rebuild it and it was fine. |
| 21 |
>> |
| 22 |
>> |
| 23 |
>> Dan |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> Are the maintainers picking up these patches to release a version bump for |
| 26 |
> packages that won't emerge with profile 17.0? |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Well, I got the patch from the cdrdao bugreport. Someone sent the patch |
| 30 |
for lame upstream, and of course they said you should be patching |
| 31 |
cdrdao... so who knows. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Dan |
Archives