1 |
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:02 AM, Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> On 09/20/2011 12:34 AM, Michael Mol wrote: |
3 |
>> I've filed two bug reports today[1][2]. Now, when filing bugs, the |
4 |
>> dropdown for 'severity' includes "Critical: The software crashes, |
5 |
>> hangs, or causes you to lose data." |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> One bug did cause data loss (a configuration wipe; I'm now amused I |
8 |
>> can use the bugtracker as a backup), and both bugs are indicated by |
9 |
>> software crashes. Both bugs have also been downgraded to 'major' by |
10 |
>> the bug wranglers. Am I misunderstanding something? |
11 |
>> |
12 |
>> [1]https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383695 |
13 |
>> [2]https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383751 |
14 |
>> |
15 |
> |
16 |
> To be honest, I downgraded the severity on those bugs to turn off the |
17 |
> distracting red highlight in the bug listing as I was wrangling. You did |
18 |
> nothing wrong. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> In my defense, if you take Gentoo Linux as a whole, problems with grip |
21 |
> and bzr rank very low compared with more critical system packages. |
22 |
|
23 |
In the case of grip, I'd normally agree, but I've had it pounded into |
24 |
my head since the 90s that buffer overflows are particularly bad, from |
25 |
a security standpoint. Admittedly, CD ripping tools (hopefully) aren't |
26 |
going to be a major attack vector. |
27 |
|
28 |
In the case of bzr, I'm not sure it should be considered of low |
29 |
importance in a source-based distro. Still, the program simply doesn't |
30 |
work (when doing a checkout). |
31 |
|
32 |
In both cases, the severity of the bug is high, although perhaps the |
33 |
importance of the bug may not be so great. |
34 |
|
35 |
> |
36 |
> Anyway, if you have a problem with the way I treat your bugs, feel free |
37 |
> to call me out on it. |
38 |
|
39 |
I really do appreciate the work you and the other wranglers do...but |
40 |
how do I do that? |
41 |
|
42 |
|
43 |
|
44 |
-- |
45 |
:wq |