Re: [gentoo-user] Telling emerge to continue when something goes wrong

[Jakob]

On 1/15/07, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. <bss03@××××××××××.net> wrote:
> On Sunday 14 January 2007 19:08, Iván Pérez Domínguez
> <ivanperezdominguez@×××××.com> wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-user] Telling
> emerge to continue when something goes wrong':
> > Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> > > I've also attached a longer system update script that I use, for
> > > reference.
> >
> > I've been taking a look at the script. I wonder why using emerge --sync
> > at the beginning and update-eix at the end instead of an eix-sync.
>
> I want the information returned by eix after the script completes to take
> into account the package updates that may occur during the portage or
> world updates.  I also want those updates to take into account the most
> recent portage tree.  So, I need a sync operation before the updates and a
> eix-update after them.  Thus, I can't combine the two operations into a
> single eix-sync.
>
> --
> "If there's one thing we've established over the years,
> it's that the vast majority of our users don't have the slightest
> clue what's best for them in terms of package stability."
> -- Gentoo Developer Ciaran McCreesh
>
>
>
Hi,
have a look at this
http://www.gentoolinux.org/news/en/gwn/20061204-newsletter.xml section
3, maybe its what you want or you could modify it to suit  your needs.

-- 
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list