| 1 |
b.n. wrote: |
| 2 |
> Qian Qiao ha scritto: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> b.n. wrote: |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>>> Hi, |
| 7 |
>>> |
| 8 |
>>> It's a bit the xeffects overlay seems unreachable. I had a (admittedly |
| 9 |
>>> brief) look on the web and it seems they are |
| 10 |
>>> moving/rebuilding/refactoring it, but I had no info on how to find it |
| 11 |
>>> now and/or when it will be back alive. |
| 12 |
>>> |
| 13 |
>>> Where can I look for instructions? |
| 14 |
>>> |
| 15 |
>>> m. |
| 16 |
>>> |
| 17 |
>> The overlay has reached it's EOL[1]. |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
>> [1] http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-641342.html |
| 20 |
>> |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> I've read the thread, and now I'm even more confused. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> - Where are the ex-xeffects ebuilds? arcon, desktop-effects or what? |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> - What is the difference between desktop-effects and xeffects? (Why |
| 27 |
> closing xeffects, if then the same people then open another overlay at |
| 28 |
> desktop-effects? I suppose *there has to be* a difference) |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
I'm pretty sure that jmbsvicetto retired from maintaining the overlay. |
| 31 |
The only difference I've seen is desktop-effects uses git. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
> - What's the best migration pathway? Is eliminating xeffects and adding |
| 34 |
> desktop-effects to layman enough, or more convoluted stuff is to be made? |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
That's all I did. |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
--Joshua Doll |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
-- |
| 42 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives