1 |
On Tue, 01 Jul 2008 00:25:16 +0200 |
2 |
Joerg.Schilling@××××××××××××××××.de (Joerg Schilling) wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> |
5 |
> Why do you start a new round and why are you now asking for completely |
6 |
> different things? |
7 |
|
8 |
|
9 |
I'm not asking different things. The question about the licenses is |
10 |
the most important for me and I've asked that same question all the |
11 |
time. It's just that now for the first time you partially gave an |
12 |
answer. |
13 |
|
14 |
|
15 |
> No non-GPL source is based on or derived from GPL code. |
16 |
|
17 |
|
18 |
OK. This is close to what I'm asking, but not exactly. Anyways, I'm glad |
19 |
to see you finally participating in this discussion. |
20 |
|
21 |
Let me make my question even more clear with an oversimplified example: |
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
You have written the program prog-a.c and published it on your site |
26 |
under the GNU GPL. |
27 |
|
28 |
I have _independently_ written the prog-b.c. |
29 |
|
30 |
Nex, I've found your program and liked it. I decide that your prog-a.c |
31 |
and my prog-b.c serve a common purpose and they complement one another. |
32 |
|
33 |
The question is if I can take your source (prog-a.c) from your site, put |
34 |
it into the same directory with my source (prog-b.c), make an archive |
35 |
of that directory and distribute the archive under CDDL? |
36 |
|
37 |
I think it is forbidden, because "prog-a.c" is published under |
38 |
the GNU GPL, which means you give me the right to distribute your work |
39 |
only under terms of the GNU GPL. |
40 |
|
41 |
|
42 |
Am I wrong? |
43 |
|
44 |
|
45 |
-- |
46 |
Best regards, |
47 |
Daniel |
48 |
-- |
49 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |