Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Daniel Iliev <daniel.iliev@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: CD/DVD burning tools?
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 00:28:05
Message-Id: 20080701032755.38b076ac@ilievnet.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: CD/DVD burning tools? by Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de (Joerg Schilling)
1 On Tue, 01 Jul 2008 00:25:16 +0200
2 Joerg.Schilling@××××××××××××××××.de (Joerg Schilling) wrote:
3
4 >
5 > Why do you start a new round and why are you now asking for completely
6 > different things?
7
8
9 I'm not asking different things. The question about the licenses is
10 the most important for me and I've asked that same question all the
11 time. It's just that now for the first time you partially gave an
12 answer.
13
14
15 > No non-GPL source is based on or derived from GPL code.
16
17
18 OK. This is close to what I'm asking, but not exactly. Anyways, I'm glad
19 to see you finally participating in this discussion.
20
21 Let me make my question even more clear with an oversimplified example:
22
23
24
25 You have written the program prog-a.c and published it on your site
26 under the GNU GPL.
27
28 I have _independently_ written the prog-b.c.
29
30 Nex, I've found your program and liked it. I decide that your prog-a.c
31 and my prog-b.c serve a common purpose and they complement one another.
32
33 The question is if I can take your source (prog-a.c) from your site, put
34 it into the same directory with my source (prog-b.c), make an archive
35 of that directory and distribute the archive under CDDL?
36
37 I think it is forbidden, because "prog-a.c" is published under
38 the GNU GPL, which means you give me the right to distribute your work
39 only under terms of the GNU GPL.
40
41
42 Am I wrong?
43
44
45 --
46 Best regards,
47 Daniel
48 --
49 gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: CD/DVD burning tools? Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de (Joerg Schilling)