| 1 |
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 08:17:30 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> > it's 60. That seems a little high based on what you told me, but I |
| 4 |
> > have no reference value to compare it to from 2-3 weeks ago. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> well, in the last few days I haven't seen any swap usage at all, which |
| 7 |
> is how the system used to run! |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Strange how the swappiness changed so dramatically in recent kernels. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I wondered the same when I checked and saw that my computers were using |
| 12 |
60 too. But when I googled about it I found references to a default of 60 |
| 13 |
from over a year ago. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Despite the cost of living it remains popular. |
Archives