Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild question
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 10:30:23
Message-Id: 20070220102513.2728f451@krikkit.digimed.co.uk
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild question by Alan McKinnon
1 On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 09:42:13 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
2
3 > 1. It's an orphan, left over from an unmerge that wasn't fully
4 > successful. if you don't need them, delete them.
5 > 2. A package was installed, and it created it's own binaries for it's
6 > own use. Portage didn't put them there so doesn't know about them. This
7 > is rare and usually applies to config and other data files. In this
8 > case it's up to you to figure out what the file is as portage can't
9 > help.
10 > 3. You compiled something long ago by hand and didn't put it
11 > in /usr/local/ like you were supposed to, and used /usr/ instead. In
12 > this case you get to remember what you did by yourself :-)
13
14 4. The file was installed by portage and subsequently modified. When
15 you uninstalled the package, portage didn't remove this file because the
16 mtime differed from what it had installed.
17
18 This typically occurs with .la files (Mark's revdep-rebuild output showed
19 some of these) after fix_libtool_files.sh has changed them.
20
21
22 --
23 Neil Bothwick
24
25 Top Oxymorons Number 11: Terribly pleased

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature