Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Grant <emailgrant@×××××.com>
To: Gentoo mailing list <gentoo-user@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] udev or Gentoo issue?
Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 12:18:24
Message-Id: CAN0CFw3U54+Wt-BmzrEqWLJgFyb_=svUTixHmonizug8s=BiQA@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] udev or Gentoo issue? by Mike Gilbert
1 >>>>>>>> I'm having a problem starting the USB network interfaces properly on
2 >>>>>>>> one of my systems. I brought the problem to the udev list and they're
3 >>>>>>>> indicating that it's a Gentoo problem:
4 >>>>>>>>
5 >>>>>>>> https://www.mail-archive.com/systemd-devel@×××××××××××××××××.org/msg18840.html
6 >>>>>>>>
7 >>>>>>>> Should I file a bug?
8 >>>>>>>>
9 >>>>>>>> - Grant
10 >>>>>>>>
11 >>>>>>> Like pointed out in the upstream thread, it's either wrongly built
12 >>>>>>> net-misc/dhcpcd (should be with USE="udev")
13 >>>>>>> and if not using dhcpcd, it might be a bug in net-misc/netifrc's
14 >>>>>>> /etc/init.d/net.lo depend() { } section --
15 >>>>>>> it's possible it's missing dependency that forces /etc/init.d/udev start
16 >>>>>>> first, specially if OpenRC is using parallel
17 >>>>>>> startup
18 >>>>>>>
19 >>>>>>> So not really a udev bug, rather a misconfiguration in dhcpcd USE flags
20 >>>>>>> OR bug in dependencies of netifrc's net.lo script
21 >>>>>> I'm starting two interfaces, one that uses dhcpcd and one that does
22 >>>>>> not. Both fail to start in the default runlevel until they are
23 >>>>>> hotplugged later. I do have dhcpcd built with USE=udev. The string
24 >>>>>> "udev" does not occur in /etc/init.d/net.lo so maybe that's the
25 >>>>>> problem? Please confirm that I should file a Gentoo bug for this.
26 >>>>>>
27 >>>>>> - Grant
28 >>>>>>
29 >>>>> Try adding 'after udev' to net.lo's depend() { } section and see if that
30 >>>>> helps, if it does, file a bug
31 >>>>> saying so.
32 >>>>
33 >>>> I added it like this and rebooted:
34 >>>>
35 >>>> depend()
36 >>>> {
37 >>>> after udev
38 >>>>
39 >>>> but the result was the same. I also have udev and udev-mount in the
40 >>>> sysinit runlevel.
41 >>>>
42 >>>>
43 >>>>> It was more of an educated guess than 100% accurate knowledge. I can't
44 >>>>> think of an another
45 >>>>> way to force netifrc to behave, since it's not coded in C, and it can't
46 >>>>> link to libudev, so...
47 >>>>>
48 >>>>> However since you say *both*, even the one with dhcpcd fail to start,
49 >>>>> before filing that bug,
50 >>>>> see if disabling netifrc hotplugging works:
51 >>>>>
52 >>>>> # ln -s /dev/null /etc/udev/rules.d/90-network.rules
53 >>>>
54 >>>> Will that disable interface renaming or hotplugging? The system with
55 >>>> the issue is remote and if the interfaces aren't renamed or if
56 >>>> hotplugging doesn't happen then I won't be able to access the system
57 >>>> for up to 24 hours. That's fine and I'm happy to test stuff like this
58 >>>> anyway but I don't think this particular test will be informative
59 >>>> because:
60 >>>
61 >>> It will disable the hotplugging, it means you *must* have the net.*
62 >>> stuff added
63 >>> to the default to runlevel yourself, like eg.
64 >>>
65 >>> # rc-update add net.foooooobar default
66 >>
67 >>
68 >> They're in the default runlevel:
69 >>
70 >> # rc-update|grep net.enp
71 >> net.enp0s20u2u1 | default
72 >> net.enp0s20u2u2 | default
73 >>
74 >> I can disable hotplugging with rc_hotplug in rc.conf. Hotplugging is
75 >> actually disabled by default there and my network interfaces won't
76 >> start automatically that way.
77 >>
78 >
79 > Does your kernel have timing info enabled? If so, it would be
80 > interesting to look at your dmesg output.
81 >
82 > My guess is that your kernel is taking a really long time (several
83 > seconds) to initialize your network cards.
84
85
86 I have this:
87
88 # dmesg | grep enp
89 [ 4.297862] systemd-udevd[659]: renamed network interface eth0 to enp0s20u2u1
90 [ 4.778289] systemd-udevd[660]: renamed network interface eth0 to enp0s20u2u2
91 [ 6.496193] ax88179_178a 3-2.1:1.0 enp0s20u2u1: ax88179 - Link status is: 1
92 [ 7.905393] ax88179_178a 3-2.2:1.0 enp0s20u2u2: ax88179 - Link status is: 1
93 #
94
95 That doesn't tell us when the network initscripts tried and failed to
96 start but this from /var/log/messages/everything/current shows the
97 first time in the boot sequence that a dependent service failed to
98 start because of the networking failure so it should be before this:
99
100 [kernel] [ 0.787433] serio: i8042 AUX port at 0x60,0x64 irq 12
101 [/etc/init.d/unbound] ERROR: cannot start unbound as net.enp0s20u2u1
102 would not start
103 [kernel] [ 0.792081] rtc_cmos 00:04: alarms up to one month, y3k,
104 242 bytes nvram, hpet irqs
105
106 - Grant

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] udev or Gentoo issue? Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o>