Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] udev or Gentoo issue?
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 01:34:57
Message-Id: CAJ0EP40wsMuhfQrMv=h5HAPOc0HS7QVoNmWDHz1s28VqtfdorA@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] udev or Gentoo issue? by Grant
1 On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 8:18 AM, Grant <emailgrant@×××××.com> wrote:
2 > I have this:
3 >
4 > # dmesg | grep enp
5 > [ 4.297862] systemd-udevd[659]: renamed network interface eth0 to enp0s20u2u1
6 > [ 4.778289] systemd-udevd[660]: renamed network interface eth0 to enp0s20u2u2
7 > [ 6.496193] ax88179_178a 3-2.1:1.0 enp0s20u2u1: ax88179 - Link status is: 1
8 > [ 7.905393] ax88179_178a 3-2.2:1.0 enp0s20u2u2: ax88179 - Link status is: 1
9 > #
10 >
11 > That doesn't tell us when the network initscripts tried and failed to
12 > start but this from /var/log/messages/everything/current shows the
13 > first time in the boot sequence that a dependent service failed to
14 > start because of the networking failure so it should be before this:
15 >
16 > [kernel] [ 0.787433] serio: i8042 AUX port at 0x60,0x64 irq 12
17 > [/etc/init.d/unbound] ERROR: cannot start unbound as net.enp0s20u2u1
18 > would not start
19 > [kernel] [ 0.792081] rtc_cmos 00:04: alarms up to one month, y3k,
20 > 242 bytes nvram, hpet irqs
21 >
22
23 Yeah, so I think the kernel is detecting your network card after udev
24 has already started.
25
26 One interesting experiment would be to delay the boot process to allow
27 the kernel additional time to detect devices. Adding rootdelay=10 to
28 your kernel command line should do the trick, unless you are using
29 some broken initramfs.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] udev or Gentoo issue? Grant <emailgrant@×××××.com>