| 1 |
Richard Fish wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 7/17/06, Anthony E. Caudel <acaudel@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> I noticed that many of them are dependencies of virtual/x11 so I added |
| 4 |
>> that to my world file, re-ran the --depclean and this time got only |
| 5 |
>> about half the recommendations. Was adding virtual/x11 to my world file |
| 6 |
>> the proper thing to do? Wonder why it wasn't there in the first place? |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Probably not. Prior to modular-X, any package that depended on |
| 9 |
> anything X related would depend on virtual/x11, which originally could |
| 10 |
> be provided by xfree86 or x.org, but now just x.org. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> As part of porting to modular-X, all (well, almost all) packages that |
| 13 |
> previously depended on virtual/x11 were updated to depend on _either_ |
| 14 |
> virtual/x11, or the specific modular-X package[s] that they really |
| 15 |
> needed. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> So the above depclean output means that none of those packages are in |
| 18 |
> your world file, and nothing in your world file depends directly or |
| 19 |
> indirectly on them, based on your current USE flags. Specifically, |
| 20 |
> nothing really depends on virtual/x11, because the dependancies are |
| 21 |
> satified by the various modular-X packages you have installed. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> So the proper thing to do here is probably add the specific apps that |
| 24 |
> you actually care about and use to world. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> -Richard |
| 27 |
Thats a little confusing because most of those are libraries and are |
| 28 |
dependencies only of virtual/x11. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Tony |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary |
| 34 |
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. |
| 35 |
-- Benjamin Franklin |
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives