1 |
On 7/17/06, Anthony E. Caudel <acaudel@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> I noticed that many of them are dependencies of virtual/x11 so I added |
3 |
> that to my world file, re-ran the --depclean and this time got only |
4 |
> about half the recommendations. Was adding virtual/x11 to my world file |
5 |
> the proper thing to do? Wonder why it wasn't there in the first place? |
6 |
|
7 |
Probably not. Prior to modular-X, any package that depended on |
8 |
anything X related would depend on virtual/x11, which originally could |
9 |
be provided by xfree86 or x.org, but now just x.org. |
10 |
|
11 |
As part of porting to modular-X, all (well, almost all) packages that |
12 |
previously depended on virtual/x11 were updated to depend on _either_ |
13 |
virtual/x11, or the specific modular-X package[s] that they really |
14 |
needed. |
15 |
|
16 |
So the above depclean output means that none of those packages are in |
17 |
your world file, and nothing in your world file depends directly or |
18 |
indirectly on them, based on your current USE flags. Specifically, |
19 |
nothing really depends on virtual/x11, because the dependancies are |
20 |
satified by the various modular-X packages you have installed. |
21 |
|
22 |
So the proper thing to do here is probably add the specific apps that |
23 |
you actually care about and use to world. |
24 |
|
25 |
-Richard |
26 |
-- |
27 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |