1 |
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann |
2 |
<volkerarmin@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> Am 17.09.2014 um 21:52 schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés: |
4 |
>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann |
5 |
>> <volkerarmin@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
6 |
>>> Am 17.09.2014 um 21:02 schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés: |
7 |
>>>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann |
8 |
>>>> <volkerarmin@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
9 |
>>>> [snip] |
10 |
>>>>> Now you use this to advertise for systemd? |
11 |
>>>>> |
12 |
>>>>> Systemd fanbois are becoming more and more desperate. |
13 |
>>>> So, systemd is used (or it has been announced that is going to be |
14 |
>>>> used) by default in all the major distributions, is available and |
15 |
>>>> working great in Gentoo, and many Gentoo users and developers use it |
16 |
>>>> happily. |
17 |
>>>> |
18 |
>>>> So, yeah, we are *really* desperate, obviously. |
19 |
>>>> |
20 |
>>>> Thanks for the laugh. |
21 |
>>>> |
22 |
>>>> Regards. |
23 |
>>> you will stop laughing when redhat&poettering abandon systemd because it |
24 |
>>> is 'fundamentally broken' and must be replaced with something else. |
25 |
>>> |
26 |
>>> Probably as soon as everybody got used to it. |
27 |
>>> |
28 |
>>> And if I guess correctly, pulseaudio will be the driving force behind |
29 |
>>> it. Because history loves repetition. |
30 |
>> Sure Volker, whatever you say. I'm willing to bet the future stability |
31 |
>> of my desktop and server machines that your doomsday-scenario will not |
32 |
>> happen. Actually, I'm already betting on it. |
33 |
>> |
34 |
>> What are you willing to bet? |
35 |
>> |
36 |
>> Again, thanks for the laughs. You are a funny guy. |
37 |
>> |
38 |
>> Regards. |
39 |
> |
40 |
> I am not betting anything. |
41 |
|
42 |
I figured it. |
43 |
|
44 |
> But I want you to think about something: |
45 |
> |
46 |
> devfs was the best thing since sliced bread. |
47 |
> As soon as everybody used it, it was broken and replaced. |
48 |
> |
49 |
> hal was the best thing since sliced bread. |
50 |
> As soon as everybody used it, it was broken and abandoned. |
51 |
> |
52 |
> *kit? |
53 |
> The same. |
54 |
|
55 |
Yeah. So it happened with XFree86, aRts, esd, gnome-vfs, DCOP, |
56 |
sendmail, and it will happen again with dbus (I'm willing to bet it |
57 |
will be replaced, at least in Linux, with kdbus). And, BTW, it's |
58 |
happening with SysV being replaced in Linux with systemd. |
59 |
|
60 |
It happens all the time. It's a good thing. And it happened for *VERY* |
61 |
different reasons in each case. Also, the transition has been |
62 |
sometimes somewhat difficult (HAL comes to mind), but most of the |
63 |
times really easy: we used devfs when I switched to Gentoo more than |
64 |
10 years ago, and I don't remember being difficult the switch to udev. |
65 |
XFree86 => X.org was also basically trivial. |
66 |
|
67 |
Of course systemd can be replaced; if something cooler gets written, |
68 |
we'll switch to it. But given the team behind systemd, and the design |
69 |
it has, it's gonna be very difficult. |
70 |
|
71 |
Using Linus words, you are making excuses. You can compare systemd to |
72 |
HAL, but doing so only shows that you don't know the code, the design, |
73 |
and the history behind both projects. |
74 |
|
75 |
Regards. |
76 |
-- |
77 |
Canek Peláez Valdés |
78 |
Profesor de asignatura, Facultad de Ciencias |
79 |
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México |