Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Linus Torvalds on systemd
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 22:34:14
Message-Id: 541A0C59.7060901@googlemail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Linus Torvalds on systemd by "Canek Peláez Valdés"
1 Am 17.09.2014 um 23:03 schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
2 > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
3 > <volkerarmin@××××××××××.com> wrote:
4 >> Am 17.09.2014 um 21:52 schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
5 >>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
6 >>> <volkerarmin@××××××××××.com> wrote:
7 >>>> Am 17.09.2014 um 21:02 schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
8 >>>>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
9 >>>>> <volkerarmin@××××××××××.com> wrote:
10 >>>>> [snip]
11 >>>>>> Now you use this to advertise for systemd?
12 >>>>>>
13 >>>>>> Systemd fanbois are becoming more and more desperate.
14 >>>>> So, systemd is used (or it has been announced that is going to be
15 >>>>> used) by default in all the major distributions, is available and
16 >>>>> working great in Gentoo, and many Gentoo users and developers use it
17 >>>>> happily.
18 >>>>>
19 >>>>> So, yeah, we are *really* desperate, obviously.
20 >>>>>
21 >>>>> Thanks for the laugh.
22 >>>>>
23 >>>>> Regards.
24 >>>> you will stop laughing when redhat&poettering abandon systemd because it
25 >>>> is 'fundamentally broken' and must be replaced with something else.
26 >>>>
27 >>>> Probably as soon as everybody got used to it.
28 >>>>
29 >>>> And if I guess correctly, pulseaudio will be the driving force behind
30 >>>> it. Because history loves repetition.
31 >>> Sure Volker, whatever you say. I'm willing to bet the future stability
32 >>> of my desktop and server machines that your doomsday-scenario will not
33 >>> happen. Actually, I'm already betting on it.
34 >>>
35 >>> What are you willing to bet?
36 >>>
37 >>> Again, thanks for the laughs. You are a funny guy.
38 >>>
39 >>> Regards.
40 >> I am not betting anything.
41 > I figured it.
42 >
43 >> But I want you to think about something:
44 >>
45 >> devfs was the best thing since sliced bread.
46 >> As soon as everybody used it, it was broken and replaced.
47 >>
48 >> hal was the best thing since sliced bread.
49 >> As soon as everybody used it, it was broken and abandoned.
50 >>
51 >> *kit?
52 >> The same.
53 > Yeah. So it happened with XFree86, aRts, esd, gnome-vfs, DCOP,
54 > sendmail, and it will happen again with dbus (I'm willing to bet it
55 > will be replaced, at least in Linux, with kdbus). And, BTW, it's
56 > happening with SysV being replaced in Linux with systemd.
57 >
58 > It happens all the time. It's a good thing. And it happened for *VERY*
59 > different reasons in each case. Also, the transition has been
60 > sometimes somewhat difficult (HAL comes to mind), but most of the
61 > times really easy: we used devfs when I switched to Gentoo more than
62 > 10 years ago, and I don't remember being difficult the switch to udev.
63 > XFree86 => X.org was also basically trivial.
64 >
65 > Of course systemd can be replaced; if something cooler gets written,
66 > we'll switch to it. But given the team behind systemd, and the design
67 > it has, it's gonna be very difficult.
68 >
69 > Using Linus words, you are making excuses. You can compare systemd to
70 > HAL, but doing so only shows that you don't know the code, the design,
71 > and the history behind both projects.
72 >
73 > Regards.
74
75 there was no breakage with xfree-to-xorg. True. But hal, yes. No upower
76 breakage. *kit breakage. The list is too long to ignore.
77
78 Arts was not something whole systems depended upon. And whatever
79 gnome-thingy you depend upon, you are fucked, because those guys are
80 infected with the same mindset. As soon as the bugs are ironed out and
81 everybody is using it: abandom it for something else.
82
83 That has nothing to do with 'improvement', or 'development' it is just
84 stupid.
85
86 AFAIR dcop was replaced, because of the freedesktop-gnome guys. Not
87 because anything was wrong with it. And look where it got us. No
88 improvement at all.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Linus Torvalds on systemd Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>
Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Linus Torvalds on systemd "Canek Peláez Valdés" <caneko@×××××.com>